★ the heart of the site · evidence-graded

Mitochondrial health ratings

A living, evidence-graded database of things people do — eat, take, and practice — that plausibly affect mitochondrial health. Inspired by the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation's Cognitive Vitality ratings, rebuilt from scratch for mitochondria and stretched well beyond pills into the lifestyle levers that move your cellular power plants.

87 interventions · 15 categories · rated for evidence, benefit & safety

How to read these ratings (and the honest caveats)

Each entry gets three dials. EVIDENCE = quality of the human data (Strong = multiple RCTs / meta-analyses; Moderate = some RCTs or consistent cohorts; Preliminary = small or early human trials; Weak = little direct human data; Mixed = conflicting). BENEFIT = likely upside for mitochondrial function specifically. SAFETY = how safe for most healthy adults. Honest caveat: human trials rarely measure mitochondria directly, so many ratings lean on the best proxies — muscle-biopsy studies, VO2max, metabolic and oxidative-stress markers — plus mechanism. This is a synthesis for orientation, not medical advice. Talk to a clinician before changing anything.

Evidence =Strong=Moderate=Preliminary=Weak=Mixed
Benefit =High=Moderate=Low=Harmful
Safety =High=Moderate=Caution=Low

This is a synthesis for orientation, not medical advice. Evidence for many mitochondrial-specific effects is indirect; ratings reflect the best available human data plus mechanism. Found a strong study I'm missing? tell me.